Value selection menus (like mix weight) are opposite of natural and expected order.

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Edit almost any function that requires a numerical value selection such as 
mixing.
2. Select a value entry such as mix weight.
3. Increase or decrease value.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Normal and natural expectation is that larger values should be above smaller 
values:
2
1
0
-1
...

Actual presentation is smaller values are above larger values:
-1
0
1
2
...

The result is that you have to scroll DOWN or hit the DOWN arrow key to 
INCREASE the value and scroll UP or hit the UP arrow key to DECREASE the value, 
which is counter-intuitive.  This trips me up every time and I do not know how 
a product such as this could have gotten past the first public presentation 
without this being corrected.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

I started with companion9x v. 1.27 and am currently using 1.28. 

Please provide any additional information below.

I would strongly recommend correcting this behavior before the Taranis is 
shipped to customers, as this is likely to significantly increase the user base 
of companion9x and many of these new users may develop and post negative 
opinions about the OpenTx product based on counter-intuitive operation of the 
otherwise fine companion9x that is such a useful and widely advertised tool to 
use with OpenTx.  It certainly appears to me to be an integral part of OpenTx 
and Taranis.

J.P. 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by the.aero...@gmail.com on 26 May 2013 at 7:44

[GoogleCodeExporter]

no more combo boxes around for numbers.
Should be fixed in SVN.

Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2013 at 9:05

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2013 at 9:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks Romolo!

Original comment by bson...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2013 at 12:14

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Thanks

J.P.

Original comment by the.aero...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2013 at 7:36