search

roberto1903 / companion9x

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/companion9x
0 stars 0 forks source link

not consistent naming of Custom Switches #226

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.open the attached file "Custom SW bugg -Eng 1.JPG" ,the picture is a print 
screen and paste on, "Custom Switches",Custom Functions" and "Simulator"
2.look at the names inside the red markings, its not consistent naming
3.the drop down menu on "Custom Functions tab" seems to be the most logical ?

4.Its the same with Swedish language translation

What is the expected output?
I expect consistent naming :-) 

What do you see instead?
inconsistent naming :-)

What version of the product are you using?
Companion9x 1.45 rev 2213

On what operating system?
Windows-XP SP3

Which firmware have you selected ?
opentx-taranis-se-r2688.bin and opentx-taranis-en-r2688.bin

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by 483917 on 9 Aug 2013 at 2:46

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Not enough space to make them consistent the simulator screen will enlarge too 
much
We really trust our users intelligence :)

Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com on 9 Aug 2013 at 2:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Ok understand , but the names are different in "drop down menus" on "Custom 
Swiches tab" CS1,,CS9,CS10,,,CS32 and on "Custom Functions tab" 
CS1,,,CS9,CSA,CSB,CSC and on simulator SW1,,,SW9,SWA,SWB,SWC. They should all 
be named like they are in "drop down menus" on Custom Functions eg 
CS1,,,CS9,CSA,CSB,CSC ,,,,CSW ,just a thought :-)

Original comment by 483917 on 9 Aug 2013 at 3:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Fixed:
names now are armonized

Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com on 9 Aug 2013 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
wow thanks a lot, a lot of work to modify the source code, but it was much 
needed change, because it allows users to more easily understand how to program 
in OpenTX, less confusing and less questions

Original comment by 483917 on 9 Aug 2013 at 11:06