Closed zdebanos closed 4 months ago
Do you think that we have to set qtgRTScope as new "official" RTScope application, and definetely move to pyqtgraph instead of pyqwt?
Personally, I am not sure, because I haven't used any of these libraries before. But judging from the amout of support, pyqtgraph looks more promising. I can try to add some legends to pyqwt app, too.
In the future we have probably to decide the "official" plot application between RTScope. qtgRTScope and an additional application (similar to other 2, available on my PC yet) wich sends the signals to PlotJuggler.
PlotJuggler can be simply installed using "snap" under Debian.
Reconfigure pyplt.ui to add a QTableWidget to incorporate names for signals. The number of rows depends on the number of signals in the Signals spin box. If the nth signal is empty, the name "Signal n" is used instead.
Please, look at the new QTForm. If you don't like anything I'd be happy to fix it.