Open robinrojh opened 2 years ago
The command definition specifies "total strengths/weaknesses". It cannot be inferred from this that it could be an alphabetical comparison (as the word would be "individual" rather than "total" ). It also could not be inferred as "only the first strength/weakness" since the word "total" is used in the definition.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: I have stated this as an issue because the word total is not enough of an explanation. By saying total strengths/weaknesses, does it mean the number of them? How can we quantify strengths and weaknesses? It could also mean a strength could be more important than another, as the word "total" does not contain information on what data is compared. If it was the number of strengths/weaknesses, then it should be stated as "total number of strengths/weaknesses" instead.
The descriptions are vague because there is no explanation of what the items are sorted based on.
The possible options for sorting are the following:
However, it is not possible to infer from the User Guide what the sort commands sort based on.