Currently, we only support Pose, which is stored in a project as a reference to the action point's orientation (position of AP + referenced orientation forms the pose). Right now, even in actions where the position would be enough, the pose has to be used instead, which means that a user has to create an AP with actually useless orientation. This might be less confusing and simpler if we support a Position type (a reference to AP instead of its orientation). The support is already prepared in the backend (https://github.com/robofit/arcor2/issues/736).
Kapim
commented
1 year ago
Currently, we only support
Pose, which is stored in a project as a reference to the action point's orientation (position of AP + referenced orientation forms the pose). Right now, even in actions where the position would be enough, the pose has to be used instead, which means that a user has to create an AP with actually useless orientation. This might be less confusing and simpler if we support aPositiontype (a reference to AP instead of its orientation). The support is already prepared in the backend (https://github.com/robofit/arcor2/issues/736).