Closed jgvictores closed 7 years ago
Just to clarify, I was talking about the yarp-devices repo. In case there are differences between the code in this folder and the code in the same-level, I find correct to place all the sources for the plugins in a folder to distinguish them from the rest of the code. But, instead of naming this folder TeoYarp, as it is no longer related to Teo, I would call the folder 'yarp-devices' (or another descriptive name).
If all the plugins are similar, I think it is ok to put them on the same level.
Correct. Also clarifying, this happens among several repositories, that contain a YARP plugins folder which was not correctly renamed during the great transition. For instance:
I'd pick a catchy name and use it consistently across all repos. Somebody took a step ahead a while ago and created a yarpplugins
directory at openrave-yarp-plugins. On the other hand, YARP itself distinguishes between carriers and devices, placing them in their own folder: yarp/src/{carriers+devices}.
@jgvictores if you think that all of the changes are correct and there is nothing more to change, please close this issue :)
Yes, I also did this on openrave-yarp-plugins, so I think we're good to go.
@rsantos88 Thanks!
On the other hand, YARP itself distinguishes between carriers and devices, placing them in their own folder: yarp/src/{carriers+devices}.
Regarding this, I think we're okay to go for now, no existing carriers, no short-term plans, no long-term plans of creating many.
As spoken with @David-Estevez the current names (
TeoYarp
, etc) are misleading. Options:Opinions?