Open RaulFdzbis opened 8 years ago
Yes, models and configurations should go in https://github.com/roboticslab-uc3m/xgnitive/tree/develop/share (maybe later on we will move models outside of the repository, but using the ResourceFinder is a great first step!)
I'm particularly concerned about: https://github.com/roboticslab-uc3m/xgnitive/tree/develop/programs/models How about a teo-openrave-models repository for the robot, and xgnitive scenarios within our own share ?
Yes i like the idea, as far as i know the TEO openrave models folder is used at least in teo-main and xgnitive. So maybe could be a good idea to have that folder as an independent repository.
Just a question, what do you plan to add to that repository in addition to the models?. I think that maybe having something similar to a TeoSim standalone repository with the models could be nice.
My idea (related with https://github.com/roboticslab-uc3m/QA/issues/1 and https://github.com/roboticslab-uc3m/QA/issues/2) is:
That's look fine to me. The only thing that still unclears is what would you put in the new teo-openrave-models repository.
Only the teo openrave models.
Ok that can work, lets do it.
Cool, looks good! Thanks!
@jgvictores should we not keep this open until we configure xgnitive to work with the teo-openrave-models?
Okay!
@jgvictores Should do we close this with the last commit?
Still have to move things around, such as: https://github.com/roboticslab-uc3m/xgnitive/tree/develop/programs/cgdaExecutionOET/conf
In the current implementation of the xgnitive project absolute paths are used in order to find the different resources needed for the system.
As an improvement an implementation of a shared resources folder is proposed. Something similar to what is done in teo-main . This way absoulute paths would be no longer needed, increasing the portability of the project.