robotis-pandora
commented
11 years ago Okay Thank you NaN But we need to seperate dxl core and HaViMo fuction. What if HaViMo functions moves to libraries foloder?
Closed tician closed 11 years ago
robotis-pandora
commented
11 years ago Okay Thank you NaN But we need to seperate dxl core and HaViMo fuction. What if HaViMo functions moves to libraries foloder?
Hopefully it is all a bit smaller and cleaner.
Removed all binary and configuration files (.class and .properties files) produced by the java compiler by running 'ant clean' in '/processing-core/' and '/processing-head/build/' folders. Renamed the linux and windows avr* archives to arm* and added those changes to the build.xml file. Commented out references to avr from the build file, but did not delete lines yet (or delete AVR-only eeprom.h). Hope others could verify it does not break anything (everything compiles fine, but do not have a board with me to test - might get into the lab later today to test it). Reduced timeout multiplier in 'dxl_hal.c' from 100ms to 1ms. Re-added HaViMo2 functions to 'dxl_core.c' and 'Dynamixel.cpp'. Renamed 'dynamixel_address_tables.h' to 'dxl_devices.h' and cleaned it up a bit. Removed 'HaViMo2.h' from libraries folder (not needed if included in core). Fixed references to 'dynamixel_address_tables.h' in 'examples/ported/'.