francesco-romano
commented
9 years ago There is a preliminary modification into a branch (I don't remember the name, but I pushed into it 2 days ago)
The problem is that without major changes (imho) it is not possible to set the transformation. (The modifications are: moving xBase to a static object. But at this point does it make sense to maintain the full 16+n input to the blocks?)
In the branch I added a new block. If the block is added to the model, the external input to the various block should be considered (I haven't tested this part. Maybe there are issues here) At the current state the input to the new block is ignored. If the solution work we can remove it
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 27/mag/2015, alle ore 07:57, Daniele notifications@github.com ha scritto:
As far as I am concerned, the world-to-base rototranslation passed to all blocks through "q" is not taken into account, and it is handled at lower levels from specific configurations. Should we modify all blocks so that this rototranslation is actually used? @jeljaik @francesco-romano @traversaro
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
jeljaik
As far as I am concerned, the world-to-base rototranslation passed to all blocks through "q" is not taken into account, and it is handled at lower levels from specific configurations. Should we modify all blocks so that this rototranslation is actually used? @jeljaik @francesco-romano @traversaro