Open drdanz opened 5 years ago
currently the namespace used for the only class(stub) present is robotology.
Personal opinion, it is a bit too long to write... It's fine with me anyway
Please: rtl
. It's just what one would think after reading robotology-template-library
, just as for the standard one.
my only concern is that with rtl there can be collision with other namespace more easily. otherwise it will be fine also for me
Are there any other rtd library out there that are likely to clash with this one? Otherwise I would always prefer brevity over lengthness for a namespace.
with all the possible interpretation of the acronym rtl like RunTimeLibrary, Real-TimeLibrary and so on, the risk of collision in the present or in the future is too high. I would exclude rtl. let's think some other abbreviation:
other?
with all the possible interpretation of the acronym rtl like RunTimeLibrary, Real-TimeLibrary and so on, the risk of collision in the present or in the future is too high. I would exclude rtl. let's think some other abbreviation:
I still think that we should just go for rtl
, but I see your point.
I would like to propose robotl
that is a sound combination of robot
, template library
and library
.
Otherwise rbtl
.
Another concern is that any robotology
related namespace could collide with other robotology repository. Perhaps we should choose a "standard" robotology namespace and use a sub-namespace. Or perhaps it's just overkill
i'm ok with both robotl and rbtl. @drdanz tiebreak!
We should enclose all the library in a namespace. I also suggest we use c++11 inline namespace for versioning.
Proposals:
robotology
rbtlg
(pronounced "robotology")rtl