Closed mfussi66 closed 2 years ago
Actually the problem is that the left leg sensor is missing:
Actually the problem is that the left leg sensor is missing:
Yep @Nicogene , only the right one was mounted on the robot. I guess changing the test to check against zero should suffice.
Yep @Nicogene , only the right one was mounted on the robot. I guess changing the test to check against zero should suffice.
Yes, then if it is intentional it is fine to change the test
Additionally, I think I'll need to change the check on the correct orientation of the sensor: https://github.com/robotology/icub-models-generator/blob/a57abd304d818a2199b6a0b097866777d455db13/tests/icub-model-test.cpp#L440-L465
cc @isorrentino
@mfussi66 are we waiting for something or can we merge?
@mfussi66 are we waiting for something or can we merge?
I was waiting for the approval from @Nicogene, on my side I think we can merge.
Shall we merge?
As per title, this PR adds the FT sensor on the right leg of iCub3 to reflect the addition on the real robot.
Its transformation relative to the root link is the following:
Which corresponds to the transform in the CAD, and therefore it corresponds to the way it is mounted:
cc @S-Dafarra @pattacini