Closed martinaxgloria closed 8 months ago
I totally agree, it would be convenient to have alljoints
parts for all type of sensors, also because they can provide a performance benefit for whole-body control applications (fyi @robotology/iit-ami-scrum-masters). Anyhow, I am a bit concerned with simulated models functionality diverging w.r.t. to real robots. Can you at least open an issue in robots-configuration to track adding the same devices to the real robots?
Can you at least open an issue in robots-configuration to track adding the same devices to the real robots?
Sure, I opened an issue:
Maybe it's useful to open a twin issue in ergocub-software
cc @Nicogene
Maybe it's useful to open a twin issue in ergocub-software
If you change the xml of the real erogcub yes 👍🏻
Thanks!
So far, if you want to use the IMU test in icub-tests to test multiple sensors at once, the robot must expose in its yarprobotinterface configuration file a
multipleanalogsensorsserver
that publishes the orientation measurements for all of available sensors, with aprefix
that matches exactly the port parameter of the test (the default one is${portprefix}/alljoints/inertials
).For this reason, it would be nice to have those files upstream also for iCubV2_* simulated models
cc @Nicogene @pattacini