Closed GiulioRomualdi closed 2 years ago
I think it can be added without problems!
I think it is ok to add it. Do you envision cases where different signals have different robot_name
s?
On a more abstract level, I think this issue is a close relative to https://github.com/robotology/yarp-telemetry/issues/156
In general, I think that these issues could be solved in the long-term by adding some sort of custom configuration struct (like in https://github.com/robotology/yarp-telemetry/issues/154)
Probably we can be explicit and call it yarp_robot_name
? Just to avoid problems if in the future we want to encode other robot-related information (such as directly URI of the URDF model using the ROS-URI package://iCub/robots/iCubGenova09/model.urdf
, see https://github.com/robotology/icub-models/issues/90) and we may get confused.
I will go for yarp_robot_name!
I think it is ok to add it. Do you envision cases where different signals have different robot_names?
For the time being, I would just add a string that should contain the yarp_robot_name
of the machine where the yarp_telemetry is used.
Then I agree we should add a struct containing several info. i.e. the robot name, the text logs (the one displayed in YarpLog
for each IP)
It would be nice to add a string containing the name of the robot. The idea is to add it at the same level of
description_list
a possible name could berobot_name
.What do you think @Nicogene @S-Dafarra @traversaro @AlexAntn