Closed lrapetti closed 2 years ago
I think you are right @lrapetti, I suspect the feet size was never corrected as the asymmetry in the y direction seems small and the yoga motion in particular was always conservative enough to not be affected by this error. Could you open a PR to fix the feet size?
Could you open a PR to fix the feet size?
Sure, I can handle it. Since the same variable feet_size
is used both on left and right foot, we can keep the change minimum simply by using a symmetric value like:
feet_size = [-0.07 0.12 ; % xMin, xMax
-0.045 0.045 ]; % yMin, yMax
what do you think?
Sure, I can handle it. Since the same variable feet_size is used both on left and right foot, we can keep the change minimum simply by using a symmetric value like:
feet_size = [-0.07 0.12 ; % xMin, xMax -0.045 0.045 ]; % yMin, yMax what do you think?
fine to me :-)
PR merged and closed, thanks @lrapetti! closing the issue.
Assuming that:
Then I would expect the dimension of the foot defined on the sole frame: https://github.com/robotology/whole-body-controllers/blob/44ccfa2567938d527406837cfd848775096594bc/controllers/floating-base-balancing-torque-control/app/robots/iCubGazeboV2_5/configStateMachine.m#L155-L156 would be different on right and left foot.
I would expect something like:
where y dimensions are flipped on one foot.
@gabrielenava are my assumptions wrong? Am I missing something?