Closed gavanderhoorn closed 6 years ago
I'll also delete b166c93_kobuki_core and need to update #19 to use eed104d_kobuki_core
instead.
I am still confused so perhaps a silly question. Why delete b166c93*
repo and use eed104*
repo? Shouldn't the eed104d_kobuki_core
be also renamed to kobuki core
and the bugzoo files should use that name?
Why delete
b166c93*
repo
because it is a duplicate of eed104d_kobuki_core
, which I made using the process described in #18, and since we decided we would not mirror but instead would use single clones with multiple branches.
b166c93*
is thus not needed any longer.
Shouldn't the
eed104d_kobuki_core
be also renamed tokobuki core
and the bugzoo files should use that name?
Yes, that is what "rename the current forks" is intended to capture.
ah ok.
@wasowski @gavanderhoorn is there any chance that you could rename the forked repos, or alternatively, could you give me permission to make changes to the forked repos?
@ChrisTimperley wrote:
you could rename the forked repos
done.
We'll need to
REPO_FIX_COMMIT
andREPO_BUG_COMMIT
toDockerfile
switch
to use the provided commits.@ChrisTimperley: there's also things for the
Dockerfile
of course, so please feel free to add those to the list (just edit my post).