nanopool problem

[jfcg]

hi, i am running as: gominer -E 2,3 -url 'stratum+tcp://sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777' -user ...

i am getting the following: 2017/12/18 23:13:27 ERROR Invalid response from stratum: true 2017/12/18 23:13:27 ERROR fetching work - No job received from stratum server yet 2017/12/18 23:13:27 Error in connection to stratumserver: read tcp :49638->198.251.88.14:7777: use of closed network connection 2017/12/18 23:13:27 Connecting to sia-eu1.nanopool.org:7777 etc.

thx

[Blaster724]

I dont think the port is supposed to be :7777 I think it has to be the other port on nanopool. I think it was :9898 or something like that. It's the gatenet port I think

[jfcg]

This works: gominer -E 2,3 -url 'sia-eu1.nanopool.org:9980' -user ...

There is a problem with stratum code

[jfcg]

I could not see my account on nanopool afters hours. What is a working commandline?

[robvanmieghem]

I'll look in to it this weekend but I suspect the stratum implementation is not compatible

[robvanmieghem]

email I sent to nanopool support:

Hello,

As the author of gominer (github.com/robvanmieghem/gominer) I would like to adapt it to your stratum implementation. Can you send me a description of it since it does not seem to comply with “standard “ stratum ( if that even exists). For example, as the result of a mining.subscribe: {"method":"mining.subscribe","params":["gominer"],"id":1} you normally get something that contains the extranonce1 like {"id":1,"error":null,"result":[[["mining.notify","0101e73838f106a7"],["mining.set_difficulty","0101e73838f106a72"]],"0101e738",4]} In your case, the response is {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":true} Anyway, a description of your protocol would be handy to make gominer nanopool compliant instead of a guessing approach. By the way, on your site, you link to gominer source and binaries of siamining instead of the original one (github.com/robvanmieghem/gominer).

Best regards, Rob Van Mieghem

[robvanmieghem]

nanopool answer: "Hello, we are in the middle of upgrading the SIA backend and adding siamining pool stratum support, so there is no use to support our old connection type. Instead it would be nice to get your current stratum implementation description to make sure we've got it right." On which I replied: "gominer implements stratum as defined by siamining( https://siamining.com/stratum) which you are already implementing. Once you have a testversion available, I’ll be more than happy to test it."