Closed aboodman closed 3 years ago
Wait, are the levels enumerated correctly in your table? Am I reading it right that 1 looks the best (or should that be 3)?
The units are MB/s so bigger is better. 1 somehow managed to be terrible at everything, far slower than even “optimize for size”
This increases scan performance on our benchmarks about 7%.
Summary of tradeoffs from my testing:
Unclear how put-dirty somehow gets faster than put-clean under optimization.