tarkeez
commented
7 months ago I realize now that the sukun used in the cases I mentioned is meant to be different, same as the lam alif ligature is meant to be different to get the hamza and fatha in the middle.
On quran.com, the regular sukun (\u{0652} ◌ْ ) look like this (same as you see in the above picture from quran.com):
Where the second sukun (\u{06DF} ◌۟) over alif and waw (at least) looks like this:
Does anyone know how to get both these things to show correctly like they do on the quran.com site?
rockneverdies55
suryanto
First issue is that in many cases, instead of sukun (\u{0652} ◌ْ ), there is the upper zero character (\u{06DF} ◌۟). This seems to happen on alif ا and waw و
In Uthmani Hafs script this causes the following in the epub:
Instead of (same epub after replacing with sukun):
Second issue is lam alif لا is sometimes rendered wrong. This seems to at least happen when there is hamza and fatha on the alif.
This causes the following in the epub:
Which on quran.com looks like this:
The second issue has to do with rendering I think, because the characters they use are not regular (لْأَ) but are actually encoded like this: لْـَٔا. If you look at the quran.com picture, the hamza and fatha are between the lam and alif, so they look like this:
Whereas if I write لْأَ and render it in Hafs, it looks like this:
Which is not as nice as the quran.com rendering but much better than this:
I don't know that they do at quran.com to get لْـَٔا to show nicely with the hamza and fatha in the middle.