Closed parker-research closed 1 month ago
Yes, I have to fix that. I polled a bunch of people I respect, including our lawyer and the consensus was Apache2. I had planned all along for MIT, but was convinced at the last minute to change. But I will look into that CERN license, I hadn't heard of it!
Fixed, thanks for catching that. Also, there was a mention of dependencies which was also outdated information.
No worries, happy to help! :)
close?
Yes, fixed with cdf7f00 commit back in June.
Issue closed.
Huge fan of this work!
Just wanted to note that you have inconsistent licensing.
Have you considered using a license designed specifically for hardware; for example, the CERN Open Hardware Licence Version 2 - Permissive (CERN OHL v2 Permissive) license?