Special installation aspects (#358)

rockstor / rockstor-doc

Rockstor documentation

http://rockstor.com/docs

Other

25 stars 30 forks source link

Special installation aspects (#358) #501

Closed Hooverdan96 closed 1 month ago

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

Fixes #358

This pull request's proposal

Add a section for commonly-used "special" aspects of Rockstor installations.

Checklist

[X] With the proposed changes no Sphinx errors or warnings are generated.
[X] I have added my name to the AUTHORS file, if required (descending alphabetical order).

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

I created a first draft based on the discussion in the associated Issue #358. @phillxnet, @FroggyFlox, take a look at what could be improved/changed/removed.

Failed link check instances are the usual suspects:

(interface/docker-based-rock-ons/plex-media-server: line   54) broken    https://ark.intel.com/ - 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://ark.intel.com/
(interface/system/update_channels: line   16) broken    https://opensource.org/license/mit-0 - 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://opensource.org/license/mit-0
(interface/system/update_channels: line   16) broken    https://opensource.org/license/apache-2-0 - 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://opensource.org/license/apache-2-0

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

FYI, the linkcheck_ignore was updated for the three failures in another PR (#500) that's currently open.

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

Also, referencing #287 and see whether more/different info should be added to a static IP section.

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

@phillxnet, @FroggyFlox: take a look at this. After rebasing, I broke out the special install scenarios. I also took your "hint" in #506 to adjust the text to semantic linefeeds within the documents I touched.

phillxnet commented 1 month ago

@Hooverdan96 Thanks for applying the requested changes. Can I now look to this again, i.e. are you done with the changes?

Thanks for this monster recent docs effort by the way. Much appreciated. And my apologies to taking so long to track all your changes :) .

Hooverdan96 commented 1 month ago

you're very welcome, and no worries on it taking more time, you do have a life :).

Yes, you can review the changes now.

phillxnet commented 1 month ago

@Hooverdan96 Thanks for what is a definite improvement in installer doc coverage. And for accommodating my suggestions re rearrangements.

All looks dandy now so I'll merge a get to publishing shortly.

phillxnet commented 1 month ago

PR product PRODUCTION published.