Open neirbowj opened 1 year ago
To be clear, I don't think it is necessary for the date and variant attributes to be available as filter criteria. Exposing that information in the results table would be sufficient.
Required to fix...
AMI name
to cloud-images.json
,cloud-images.js
adding column for AMI name
field.Ideally the tooling that generates cloud-images.json
should be modified to sort the output (eg. jq 'sort_by(.version, .provider, .region, .architecture )' <input >cloud-images.json
) to minimize the diff created on future updates.
Description
Any attribute which serves to differentiate one AMI from another should be exposed on the Cloud Images page. Evidently, the image build date and an attribute which appears to be some kind of type or variant designation are such attributes which are not displayed as columns in the results table nor available as filtering criteria.
Screenshots
Files
Not evident from the submitter's perspective.
To Reproduce