Open rohit0718 opened 2 years ago
This issue was raised in the PE-Dry Run where we indicated it as the index being out of bounds. (https://github.com/AY2122S1-CS2103T-F12-3/tp/issues/126)
However, we reverted to The tutee index provided is invalid
due to the suggestions provided.
Moreover, this should not be a functionality bug as it is true that the tutee index provided is invalid.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: "This issue was raised in the PE-Dry Run where we indicated it as the index being out of bounds. However, we reverted to The tutee index provided is invalid due to the suggestions provided. " Not sure how this is relevant to the my bug. My bug talks about the command being not descriptive enough while that issue talks about the message "sound[ing] a bit jargon-y.". It seems that the team has misinterpreted my bug and has linked to an irrelevant bug from before.
I feel that the error message can indeed be more descriptive to allow the users to get a sensing about exactly which index values are valid.
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: This is not a verylow classification as it is not a cosmetic error. This is a flaw that causes occasional inconvenience to the user when they type in an index value that is beyond the number of items in the list.
The error message can be clearer and state the bounds expected for the index to the user instead.