With the introduction of SecurityCapabilities in #359, a value was added to the roundtrip test for rbx_dom_lua. This caused tests to begin to fail, as no pod was ever provided. However, in keeping with the theme of "we don't provide pods for values we don't use", we should simply not include a value for this type in tests to begin with.
This PR does exactly that, and allows rbx_dom_lua tests to pass once more.
With the introduction of SecurityCapabilities in #359, a value was added to the roundtrip test for rbx_dom_lua. This caused tests to begin to fail, as no pod was ever provided. However, in keeping with the theme of "we don't provide pods for values we don't use", we should simply not include a value for this type in tests to begin with.
This PR does exactly that, and allows rbx_dom_lua tests to pass once more.