Closed markwpearce closed 2 years ago
Yeah I've looked into that, but to make a PR to just associate .bs
with the BrightScript syntax you need to prove that there are "hundreds" of repositories using it...
- [ ] **I am associating a language with a new file extension.**
- [ ] The new extension is used in hundreds of repositories on GitHub.com
- Search results for each extension:
<!-- Replace FOOBAR with the new extension, and KEYWORDS with keywords unique to the language. Repeat for each extension added. -->
- https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&type=Code&ref=searchresults&q=extension%3AFOOBAR+KEYWORDS+NOT+nothack
Then if you actually search, I could find another languages/tools using .bs
:
TBH the real deal is that we should seriously look again at using .brs
even for brighterscript
code...
This was resolved by https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/5643
It would be great if Brighterscript was listed as a real language in Github repos!
https://github.com/github/linguist/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#adding-a-language