Closed pawelhertman closed 2 years ago
Thanks for the PR. Could you update the PR description with some information as to what this is actually solving? (i.e. why this needs to exist?).
@TwitchBronBron done (sorry, I thought the name of the PR and a test case are clear enough)
Thanks, everything looks good. Appreciate the fix!
This is a fix for unwanted prefixing function references even if a module is configured with
noprefix
option (to have a clear understanding of the case please check the unit test I changed which doesn't pass without the fix)