I'm having some issues while using your NRG impurity solver for DMFT iterations. When I choose the 2orb-UJ (QS) model, I noticed that the results from the NRG impurity solver match well with CTQMC when both baths are the same. However, when I make the two baths different (for example, changing one of them from a semi-circular density of states ranging from -1 to 1 to a semi-circular density of states ranging from -0.6 to 1), the results from the solver deviate significantly from CTQMC. The 2*occupancy column in the stat.out file is not equal to n_d1 + n_d2.
Could it be that there is an issue with the NRG parameters I have chosen, or are there other details that I might have missed?
Hi,
I'm having some issues while using your NRG impurity solver for DMFT iterations. When I choose the 2orb-UJ (QS) model, I noticed that the results from the NRG impurity solver match well with CTQMC when both baths are the same. However, when I make the two baths different (for example, changing one of them from a semi-circular density of states ranging from -1 to 1 to a semi-circular density of states ranging from -0.6 to 1), the results from the solver deviate significantly from CTQMC. The 2*occupancy column in the stat.out file is not equal to n_d1 + n_d2.
Could it be that there is an issue with the NRG parameters I have chosen, or are there other details that I might have missed?
Thank you.