Cross-check appeal for unresponsible checking

[OnlyTryHard]

1. A link to your deployed project https://rolling-scopes-school.github.io/onlytryhard-JSFEPRESCHOOL2022Q4/Plants/
2. A link to the project repository on Github. https://github.com/rolling-scopes-school/onlytryhard-JSFEPRESCHOOL2022Q4/tree/gh-pages
3. A link to the task https://github.com/rolling-scopes-school/tasks/blob/master/tasks/plants/plants-part1.md
4. A Link to the checklist for evaluating the task (if it exists) https://rolling-scopes-school.github.io/checklist/
5. A screenshot of cross-checking marks
6. A final score after self-assessment, with comments
   • Score has to be around 95-90 minimum.
   • Even if my fonts are not 700 weight, the style is normal, thus if they are under 10px fitting requirement, that should be okey.
   • CSS animations are preferable, not a must. I have all middle images with animations while person telling that "there is no animation with links in footer".
   • Person is telling that my image in Contact Us are is not sticked to the footer, while 10px is allowed.
   • Another guy telling that i failed PP totally, but i noted in Console, that i have screen wider then 1440, thus to check the PP correctly need to adjust PP by left top angle (or buy word PLANTS in the left top logo)
7. A cross-check score of your Score -Scores which they gave me are 78 and 84, what is not okey totally.

[turn2river]

Апелляция подаётся после дедлайна проверки, при соблюдении условий:

• После дедлайна не было коммитов
• Итоговая оценка отличается более чем на 10% от ожидаемой
• Оформление должно соответствовать шаблону (название неправильно)

[OnlyTryHard]

понял. Спасибо. Переделаю новую апелляцию после окончания кросс чека