Closed deepj closed 5 years ago
I’m ok with a separate branch where this is configured, otherwise we will be waiting more time for CI to finish. I can give you access to the repo so that you could maintain this branch as long as it’s experimental. Makes sense?
@solnic yes, it does make sense. In fact, I would like to see dry-rb/rom to be supported by TruffleRuby very soon. There are many interesting things in this area. Unfortunately, there are some issues with current TruffleRuby and dry-rb stuff (https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/1462 or https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/1469)
If I can help, I'm glad to do it.
@deepj great, I just invited you to rom-rb/rom, so feel free to create a truffle branch and continue working there. I'll try to help whenever/however I can.
Thx, I'll make it tonight.
@solnic Hm, there is one thing if you would interest in to help. It's also one of dependencies of ROM. dry-initializer
causes problems such as
Failure/Error: option :bar, proc(&:to_s), optional: true
ArgumentError:
wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)
# ./spec/several_assignments_spec.rb:6:in `to_s'
# ./spec/several_assignments_spec.rb:6:in `to_s'
# (eval):6:in `call'
# (eval):6:in `__dry_initializer_initialize__'
# ./lib/dry/initializer/mixin/root.rb:7:in `initialize'
# ./spec/several_assignments_spec.rb:22:in `new'
# ./spec/several_assignments_spec.rb:22:in `subject'
# ./spec/several_assignments_spec.rb:25:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/spec_helper.rb:16:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
The problem lies in Dry::Initializer::Mixin
. Unfortunately, I don't fully understand the construct and a purpose behind of it. If there was a change to isolate a root problem, it could help to TruffleRuby's developer to fix it quickly.
@deepj you want to ask @nepalez about that
I know, running specs under TruffleRuby takes a large amount of time currently and many specs fail.
The first issue is with Bundler https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/1398. And some failed specs are fixed in the next RC10 release.
Anyway, running specs under TruffleRuby even they currently fail. It helps its developers and other developer wishing to use
rom
under TruffleRuby.But it's good to consider if it's worth to accept this PR recently when running specs takes almost 27 minutes (under MRI ~2 minutes).