Not suported with EF7: ExecuteDeleteAsync and ExecuteUpdateAsync

[SerhiyBalan]

Hello!

I've been using MockQueryable with .NET6 a lot Recently my project migrated to .NET 7 (EF Core 7) And I started to use new EF7 features:

• ExecuteDeleteAsync

            ...
            .Where(user => user.Id == id)
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync();

ExecuteDeleteAsync implementation is here https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/blob/main/src/EFCore.Relational/Extensions/RelationalQueryableExtensions.cs#L316

• ExecuteUpdateAsync

            .Where(user => user.Id == id)
            .ExecuteUpdateAsync(updater => updater
                .SetProperty(
                    user => user.Status,
                    user => status)
                .SetProperty(
                    user => user.ModifiedBy,
                    user => _userContextProvider.GetUserId())
                .SetProperty(
                    user => user.ModifiedOn,
                    user => DateTimeOffset.UtcNow));

ExecuteUpdateAsync implementation is here https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/blob/main/src/EFCore.Relational/Extensions/RelationalQueryableExtensions.cs#L372

I use MockQueryable using a standard pattern:

           var mock = users.BuildMock();
           _userRepository.Setup(x => x.GetQueryable()).Returns(mock);

ToListAsync(), FirstOrDefaultAsync() and others works perfectly with this pattern.

Unfortunately ExecuteUpdateAsync / ExecuteDeleteAsync doesn't work at all :(

When I try to run a unit test, a mocked GetQueryable method works nicely as usual, but it throws an exception on ExecuteDeleteAsync

 <System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.
 ---> System.InvalidOperationException: There is no method 'ExecuteDelete' on type 'Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalQueryableExtensions' that matches the specified arguments
   at System.Linq.EnumerableRewriter.FindMethod(Type type, String name, ReadOnlyCollection`1 args, Type[] typeArgs)
   at System.Linq.EnumerableRewriter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression m)
   at System.Linq.EnumerableExecutor`1.Execute()
   at System.Linq.EnumerableQuery`1.System.Linq.IQueryProvider.Execute[TElement](Expression expression)
   at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalQueryableExtensions.ExecuteDelete[TSource](IQueryable`1 source)
   at lambda_method34(Closure)
   at MockQueryable.Core.TestQueryProvider`1.CompileExpressionItem[TResult](Expression expression)
   at MockQueryable.Core.TestQueryProvider`1.Execute[TResult](Expression expression)
   at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethod(Object target, Void** arguments, Signature sig, Boolean isConstructor)
   at System.Reflection.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object obj, IntPtr* args, BindingFlags invokeAttr)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Reflection.MethodInvoker.Invoke(Object obj, IntPtr* args, BindingFlags invokeAttr)
   at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)
   at System.Reflection.MethodBase.Invoke(Object obj, Object[] parameters)
   at MockQueryable.EntityFrameworkCore.TestAsyncEnumerableEfCore`1.ExecuteAsync[TResult](Expression expression, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
   at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalQueryableExtensions.ExecuteDeleteAsync[TSource](IQueryable`1 source, CancellationToken cancellationToken)

Exception throws here on .Invoke(this, new object[] { expression }); https://github.com/romantitov/MockQueryable/blob/master/src/MockQueryable/MockQueryable.EntityFrameworkCore/TestQueryProviderEfCore.cs#L25

Same exception throws at ExecuteUpdateAsync (but it says There is no method 'ExecuteUpdate' on type 'Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.RelationalQueryableExtensions' that matches the specified arguments)

The custom logic pattern doesn't work because ExecuteUpdateAsync / ExecuteDeleteAsync are IQueryable extensions

Thank you very much

[StuartBale-Xero]

Is there a suggested approach on how to support this? @SerhiyBalan - did you have a workaround?

[SerhiyBalan]

@StuartBale-Xero

My project uses UnitOfWork / GenericRepository pattern

So instead of using native EF's ExecuteUpdateAsync / ExecuteDeleteAsync extensions I use own methods at the Generic Repository:

public class GenericRepository<TEntity> : IRepository<TEntity>
    where TEntity : class, new()
{
    public GenericRepository(DbContext dbContext)
    {
        ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(dbContext);
        DbSet = dbContext.Set<TEntity>();
    }

    protected DbSet<TEntity> DbSet { get; }

    ...

    public virtual Task<int> ExecuteUpdateAsync(
        Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate,
        Expression<Func<SetPropertyCalls<TEntity>, SetPropertyCalls<TEntity>>> setPropertyCalls,
        CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
        => DbSet
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(predicate)
            .ExecuteUpdateAsync(setPropertyCalls, cancellationToken);

    public virtual Task<int> ExecuteDeleteAsync(
        Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate,
        CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
        => DbSet
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(predicate)
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(cancellationToken);
}

In code instead of

        await _unitOfWork
            .GetRepository<User>()
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(user => user.Id == id)
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(); // Native Entity Framework extension

I use my own methods:

        await _unitOfWork
            .GetRepository<User>()
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(user => user.Id == id); // My method in GenericRepository

Since they are no more extensions, I can easily mock them

[marcoatribeiro]

Hi, guys!

Any update on this? I don't use the UoW / repository and it would be really interesting if MockQueryable could support these methods.

[tiagoseminotti]

Hi, guys!

Any update on this? I don't use the UoW / repository and it would be really interesting if MockQueryable could support these methods.

same here...

[romantitov]

Hello. Thanks for you contribution. Sorry for the late answer. Unfortunately I'm very busy at the moment. If you provide a pull request with fix of the issue I would be happy to include it to the next release. Please don't forget to cover the case by additional tests to minimize possibility of regressions for the future. Thanks for the understanding.

[hpaygu-icims]

@StuartBale-Xero

My project uses UnitOfWork / GenericRepository pattern

So instead of using native EF's ExecuteUpdateAsync / ExecuteDeleteAsync extensions I use own methods at the Generic Repository:

public class GenericRepository<TEntity> : IRepository<TEntity>
    where TEntity : class, new()
{
    public GenericRepository(DbContext dbContext)
    {
        ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(dbContext);
        DbSet = dbContext.Set<TEntity>();
    }

    protected DbSet<TEntity> DbSet { get; }

    ...

    public virtual Task<int> ExecuteUpdateAsync(
        Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate,
        Expression<Func<SetPropertyCalls<TEntity>, SetPropertyCalls<TEntity>>> setPropertyCalls,
        CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
        => DbSet
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(predicate)
            .ExecuteUpdateAsync(setPropertyCalls, cancellationToken);

    public virtual Task<int> ExecuteDeleteAsync(
        Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> predicate,
        CancellationToken cancellationToken = default)
        => DbSet
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(predicate)
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(cancellationToken);
}

In code instead of

        await _unitOfWork
            .GetRepository<User>()
            .AsQueryable()
            .Where(user => user.Id == id)
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(); // Native Entity Framework extension

I use my own methods:

        await _unitOfWork
            .GetRepository<User>()
            .ExecuteDeleteAsync(user => user.Id == id); // My method in GenericRepository

Since they are no more extensions, I can easily mock them

@SerhiyBalan But does it work well? since ExecuteUpdate doesn't follow UoW and repository pattern. My project has same scenario where existing code is using repository pattern and UoW since I need to implement bulk update action, I'm clueless how to do it if I already have repository pattern in place

[romantitov]

Hello everyone. @lazaro-ansaldi made a great contribution for the issue in his pull request. Thanks @lazaro-ansaldi for that! The source code is currently available in a separate branch and in the release 7.0.4-beta. Please feel free to give me your feedback. Once everyone will be happy I will merge these changes into the master branch and create a regular release.

[icnocop]

Thank you, Roman.

I recently made a comment to the PR here and want to know if my assumption of how the mocked ExecuteUpdate and ExecuteUpdateAsync methods are expected to work is correct.

I expected the underlying data to be updated.

For example, given a mocked DbSet<User>, which was created from a list containing one User with Id 1, when dbSet.Where(x => x.Id == 1).ExecuteUpdate(x => x.SetProperty(x => x.FirstName, "New first name")); is called, then I expected the user's first name to be updated.

If that's the wrong assumption, is there a way to update the underlying data when ExecuteUpdate or ExecuteUpdateAsync is called such that the entities are updated according to the SetProperty method?

Thank you.

[mithun-shirali]

Hello everyone. @lazaro-ansaldi made a great contribution for the issue in his pull request. Thanks @lazaro-ansaldi for that! The source code is currently available in a separate branch and in the release 7.0.4-beta. Please feel free to give me your feedback. Once everyone will be happy I will merge these changes into the master branch and create a regular release.

Thanks @romantitov & @lazaro-ansaldi . This worked for me with testing ExecuteUpdateAsync()!

[pooyahadavi]

Big thanks to @romantitov and @lazaro-ansaldi. I also used the new feature for testing ExecuteUpdateAsync