rongarret / clmm

An exercise in cryptographic minimlism
Other
24 stars 0 forks source link

document the "design issues" mentioned? #1

Open mdecerbo opened 5 years ago

mdecerbo commented 5 years ago

The README says:

CLMM itself has a number of design issues that make it unsuitable for serious security applications in its current form

Would you mind expanding? At least to this observer it's not obvious what those issues would be.

rongarret commented 5 years ago

I’d have to go back and look. But CLMM has been superseded by SC4:

https://github.com/Spark-Innovations/SC4

rg

On Nov 4, 2019, at 3:00 PM, mdecerbo notifications@github.com wrote:

The README says:

CLMM itself has a number of design issues that make it unsuitable for serious security applications in its current form

Would you mind expanding? At least to this observer it's not obvious what those issues would be.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

mdecerbo commented 5 years ago

Well, sure, and SC4 looks interesting. But I was interested in CLMM as a bite-sized educational tool, just not sure what caveats I should have in mind.

rongarret commented 5 years ago

Ah. OK, let me take a look and see if I can remember what the problems were.

On Nov 4, 2019, at 6:42 PM, mdecerbo notifications@github.com wrote:

Well, sure, and SC4 looks interesting. But I was interested in CLMM as a bite-sized educational tool, just not sure what caveats I should have in mind.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.