search

ronsavage / SQL

BNF Grammars for SQL-92, SQL-99 and SQL-2003
MIT License
370 stars 92 forks source link

Definition of <bit string literal> not found. #24

Open GCer-Hidenori opened 4 years ago

GCer-Hidenori commented 4 years ago

At line 220 of sql-2003-2.bnf,<bit string literal> is used. But there is no definition.

ronsavage commented 4 years ago

Hi

And at 221 likewise. This is probably due to the way Jonathan converted the html into bnf. Or some things in the standard are defined in another standard. The latter is most likely.

Ron Savage savage.net.au On 2020-03-15 13:56, GCer-Hidenori wrote:

At line 220 of sql-2003-2.bnf, is used. But there is no definition.

-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2].

Links:

[1] https://github.com/ronsavage/SQL/issues/24 [2] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFH6AWWTSNEAUNPW2X6WDRHQ7W5ANCNFSM4LKI6TIA

GCer-Hidenori commented 4 years ago

I found strange thing. <bit string literal> is used in <nondelimiter token> definition. And <nondelimiter token> is used in <token> definition. But <token> is used nowhere.

ronsavage commented 4 years ago

Hi

is defined at line 213: ::= | --- Ron Savage savage.net.au On 2020-03-15 22:57, GCer-Hidenori wrote: > I found strange thing. > is used in definition. > And is used in definition. > But is used nowhere. > > -- > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2]. Links: ------ [1] https://github.com/ronsavage/SQL/issues/24#issuecomment-599200755 [2] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFH6BN4LGYADKSQQ5XBPDRHS7DZANCNFSM4LKI6TIA
GCer-Hidenori commented 4 years ago

Hi

Yes,you are right. <token> is defined at line 213

But there is no reference to it from anywhere.

ronsavage commented 4 years ago

Hi

I'll have a look at it sometime, but I just got home from 6 days in hospital, so I'm taking it easy right now. And the great news is that the operation was 100% successful.

Ron Savage savage.net.au On 2020-03-23 17:36, GCer-Hidenori wrote:

Hi

Yes,you are right.

is defined at line 213 But there is no reference to it from anywhere. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2].

Links:

[1] https://github.com/ronsavage/SQL/issues/24#issuecomment-602412813 [2] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFH6BMPCRUS55I3FY26O3RI37PZANCNFSM4LKI6TIA

GCer-Hidenori commented 4 years ago

I’m very happy to hear your operation was successful. I hope you could leave the hospital soon.

ronsavage commented 4 years ago

Hi

I'm home now, but very tired, so doing virtually no work.

Ron Savage savage.net.au On 2020-03-28 07:57, GCer-Hidenori wrote:

I'm very happy to hear your operation was successful. I hope you could leave the hospital soon.

-- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or unsubscribe [2].

Links:

[1] https://github.com/ronsavage/SQL/issues/24#issuecomment-605410550 [2] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFH6EBXVMQM6CEQKYW4O3RJWUVVANCNFSM4LKI6TIA

GCer-Hidenori commented 4 years ago

There are times like that. Have a good rest.