[Bitcoin] Refactor process_utxos and add BitcoinSatStore to track inscriptions correctly

[adshao]

According to the documentation on inscriptions, inscriptions are inscribed on sats. This implies that in order to accurately track inscriptions with their correct sequence numbers to ordinals.com, it is essential to monitor sats in alignment with the principles of ordinal theory.

Sats should be numbered and transferred according to the algorithm specified in Ord BIP.

The relationship between sats and inscriptions is summarized as follows:

• Multiple inscriptions can be inscribed on the same sat by reinscription
• Multiple inscriptions can be inscribed on different sats in an input by pointer
• An inscription is only transferred when its corresponding sat is sent to a new owner
• Cursed inscription should be uncursed after the jubilee height

Our current tracking of inscriptions seems to be incorrect in the following aspects:

• coinbase tx should be processed in the end of the block, as seen in rooch and ord
• The transfer of an inscription is identified by tracking the old sats and inscriptions associated with the input, as detailed in ord

[adshao]

In fact, tracking SAT_TO_SATPOINT and OUTPOINT_TO_SAT_RANGES within index_sats is not necessary. Instead, our focus should solely be on monitoring satpoint_to_sequence_number and sequence_number_to_inscription_entry as demonstrated in inscriptions_on_output, as well as outpoint_to_value.

We need to implement the logic of index_inscriptions.

[jolestar]

Implement the full inscription logic at https://github.com/rooch-network/rooch/blob/main/frameworks/bitcoin-move/sources/inscription_updater.move

And verify the case with ord events in https://github.com/rooch-network/rooch/blob/main/crates/rooch-framework-tests/src/tests/bitcoin_tester_test.rs

Except:

1. Sat index: Rooch does not handle the Sat index.
2. Fee: the fee in the ordinals protocol is to display the cost; Rooch does not handle the fee logic.