Open jolestar opened 1 week ago
🙋♀️
@jolestar I printed the command line output using rooch account create
but they're the different addresses:
rooch init --config-dir ./test
Rooch server config file generated at ./test/server.yaml
Creating client config file ["./test/rooch.yaml"] with rooch native validator.
Enter a password to encrypt the keys. Press enter to leave it an empty password:
Generated new keypair for address [0x94b1f7f69fa9bbe4d4c65c561bac462fd1de085ab0e3b9ea2d237d3f111db56c]
Secret Recovery Phrase : [review push decide quit amused barrel diagram uncle scorpion firm accuse transfer]
Rooch client config file generated at ./test/rooch.yaml
null
rooch account list --config-dir ./test
Rooch Address (Ed25519) | Multichain Address | Public Key (Base64) | Has session key | Active Address
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x94b1f7f69fa9bbe4d4c65c561bac462fd1de085ab0e3b9ea2d237d3f111db56c | | AIgNoJ4mjVDaJ1RzVtbteSdFkXYb6HZjlmCgF1+ejkdj | false | True
rooch account create --config-dir ./test
Generated new keypair for address with key pair type [0x87e67fc771fe08dd6fa6c4220e184ff58a209be5cc6cee36ecdfece9207dd05f]
Secret Recovery Phrase : [review push decide quit amused barrel diagram uncle scorpion firm accuse transfer]
"0x87e67fc771fe08dd6fa6c4220e184ff58a209be5cc6cee36ecdfece9207dd05f"
rooch account list --config-dir ./test
Rooch Address (Ed25519) | Multichain Address | Public Key (Base64) | Has session key | Active Address
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x87e67fc771fe08dd6fa6c4220e184ff58a209be5cc6cee36ecdfece9207dd05f | | AG6+zNp8Q74D6vPq+gVYZ+a6pvY/MzAMk4I2WnkCdzJg | false |
0x94b1f7f69fa9bbe4d4c65c561bac462fd1de085ab0e3b9ea2d237d3f111db56c | | AIgNoJ4mjVDaJ1RzVtbteSdFkXYb6HZjlmCgF1+ejkdj | false | True
rooch account create --config-dir ./test
Generated new keypair for address with key pair type [0xfd518e245ab24f9426055eedbdc30199fd7d13fc94a6c7a1e596b87e9f4ff2d3]
Secret Recovery Phrase : [review push decide quit amused barrel diagram uncle scorpion firm accuse transfer]
"0xfd518e245ab24f9426055eedbdc30199fd7d13fc94a6c7a1e596b87e9f4ff2d3"
rooch account list --config-dir ./test
Rooch Address (Ed25519) | Multichain Address | Public Key (Base64) | Has session key | Active Address
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x87e67fc771fe08dd6fa6c4220e184ff58a209be5cc6cee36ecdfece9207dd05f | | AG6+zNp8Q74D6vPq+gVYZ+a6pvY/MzAMk4I2WnkCdzJg | false |
0x94b1f7f69fa9bbe4d4c65c561bac462fd1de085ab0e3b9ea2d237d3f111db56c | | AIgNoJ4mjVDaJ1RzVtbteSdFkXYb6HZjlmCgF1+ejkdj | false | True
0xfd518e245ab24f9426055eedbdc30199fd7d13fc94a6c7a1e596b87e9f4ff2d3 | | AH3A0hIueJbqXnJm2wYSgpvK/Fpr7oHbio4Q6sFMRfVn | false |
However, there's an order issue with the rooch account list
command.
@feliciss use the latest version.
@feliciss use the latest version.
I see there are differences:
{
"keys": {
"rooch1y9kygtg2epl2c9pm9ak3zvk6n0ekwu2y3jr3p5xdaascj88jy7zqccejv0": {
"nonce": "2h/qt97R8Rl151Zn",
"ciphertext": "042RGxSSAz4PRyQhXQH+U6u7512cgrnQytHUmt/1tAm8HUIOHEw8lX697cY2",
"tag": "XqCVndUxnWl/7BHlaxnFEw=="
},
"rooch1klfvadnu9upzt56k8aa5gs08puptkkfey3pyltq29uqljwmc4alq7yy4hx": {
"nonce": "9FzQmt4QwGC5vayO",
"ciphertext": "7DfT8c7TPBo6ZSEXRG+QcaUf8lV5ty7zCHN2DFuppqf2CnasBMzzwwBLDnes",
"tag": "FduidMWkBs0k9KFRyGcx5w=="
}
},
"mnemonic": {
"addresses": [
"rooch1y9kygtg2epl2c9pm9ak3zvk6n0ekwu2y3jr3p5xdaascj88jy7zqccejv0"
],
"mnemonic_phrase_encryption": {
"nonce": "VK2oWIHOFvAhOkzA",
"ciphertext": "ObsLv1YoTHBIdgefRyaqxnLOaV3zHziYkIyUCPKJUUp/ERpY5k2BCfj+yHgQfY1/lW6Y7eFzZ5wViR2Pp+yNC7nakmETaa96oX9V6eHr",
"tag": "P2ID3wd1RErD1VwkX/UX2w=="
}
},
"session_keys": {},
"password_hash": "$argon2id$v=19$m=19456,t=2,p=1$2h/qt97R8Rl151Zn$5O0xCnk6cK6JwWYyC+3fdJ2Q/7QZ7VpkUl2F2aYzGjo",
"is_password_empty": true
}
I'm trying to resolve this issue.
The issue is found by getting the mnemonic. addresses
as the account index rather than the total of keys as index.
I'm submitting a PR to resolve this issue.
There's only one addresses
in the mnemonic
field and getting the addresses will always result in one account_index
.
The
rooch account create
command can not create more accounts.Execute the
rooch account create
twice. It outputs the same account address.
When the account index equals to 1
and always should there be 1
, the account encryption data will be generated and leave the account_index
and derivation_path
to be the only two the same as the first-time account create
command's result.
The
rooch account create
command can not create more accounts.Execute the
rooch account create
twice. It outputs the same account address.