search

ropensci-archive / RMendeley

:no_entry: ARCHIVED :no_entry: Interface to Mendeley API methods
43 stars 6 forks source link

Update README.md before archiving? #19

Closed maelle closed 6 years ago

maelle commented 6 years ago

See also new repo DESCRIPTION

cboettig commented 6 years ago

@sckott @maelle Do we have any confirmation that Mendeley is actually working on a replacement? (That would be great; and we should probably archive either way)

sckott commented 6 years ago

no idea about this, maybe @maelle knows?

maelle commented 6 years ago

No I don't I jist read that in the readme, maybe best to delete?

cboettig commented 6 years ago

Then I'm guessing they aren't planning on that, in which case, @noamross has made a good case that maybe we should revisit our maintenance of this package. It would probably be relatively quick to do a straight-forward port of their python sdk into R with the modern R toolkit (this version is still using RCurl & ROAuth!)

maelle commented 6 years ago

Aha so no archiving? Maybe add a WIP or concept badge then?

cboettig commented 6 years ago

:+1: A concept badge sounds appropriate

maelle commented 6 years ago

Ok done! rodev::use_repostatus_badge is very useful today hehe. https://github.com/ropenscilabs/rodev

cboettig commented 6 years ago

okay, not enough coffee this morning, I somehow thought Mendeley was figshare. I think we should archive RMendeley