Blog post introducing OSF

[aaronwolen]

• [x] I have read the Content Guidelines.
• [x] I have read the Technical Guidelines.
• [x] I used or followed the R Markdown or Markdown template.
• [x] I have followed the Style Guide.
• [x] I created or updated my author metadata with correct folder name.
• [x] I have added relevant tags after browsing existing tags.
• [x] I ran roblog::ro_lint_md() on index.md (optional).
• [x] I ran roblog::ro_check_urls() on index.md (optional).
• [x] I have added the tags - Software Peer Review, my-packagename, R.
• [ ] I have added the package-version YAML tag.
• [ ] I have added acknowledgement of the reviewers' work.
• [ ] I have added a link to the software peer review thread.

Since this post focuses on OSF, rather than the osfr, I skipped some of the package-specific requirements. I thought those would be more appropriate for the follow-up post focusing on the package itself.

[steffilazerte]

Great! I'll review tomorrow morning!

[aaronwolen]

Thank you so much for the helpful review! I'll work on incorporating your suggestions asap.

[steffilazerte]

One more tag I forgot: - community, thanks!

[aaronwolen]

Hi @steffilazerte, I incorporated a few comments from friends/colleagues and did a little bit of extra copyediting after a final read through. The content is largely the same but (hopefully) more polished. Please let me know if you have any additional suggestions. Thanks so much!

[aaronwolen]

I did change the title since "Getting to Know OSF" was really just a placeholder I never updated.

Still not sure about the new one and very open to suggestions if you have any 😄