Closed dieghernan closed 3 years ago
I realised that there is a duplicated line on checks, see https://blogguide.ropensci.org/authorchecklistpeer.html
* [ ] I have read the Content Guidelines.
* [ ] I have read the Technical Guidelines.
* [ ] I used or followed the R Markdown or Markdown template.
* [ ] I have followed the Style Guide.
* [ ] I created or updated my author metadata with correct folder name.
* [ ] I have added relevant tags after browsing existing tags (incuding "community" tag).
* [ ] I have added the "tech notes" tag if this is a technote.
* [ ] I ran `roblog::ro_lint_md()` on index.md (optional).
* [ ] I ran `roblog::ro_check_urls()` on index.md (optional).
——> * [ ] I ran a spell-check on index.md.
* [ ] I have added the tags - Software Peer Review, my-packagename.
* [ ] I have added the package-version YAML tag.
* [ ] I have added acknowledgement of the reviewers' work (with links to reviewers).
* [ ] I have added a link to the software peer review thread.
——> * [ ] I ran a spell-check on index.md.
Thank you!!
Current version on CRAN of
blogdown
is 1.5. Version 1.2 (above 1.1.10) was released on 2021-03-04 , see https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/blogdown/