Closed maelle closed 1 year ago
Looks good to me! Do we want to add this to the checklists? or is that getting out of control?
On that list we have two tga related check: [ ] YAML subject tags are ok ("tech notes" for tech notes; "community" for non-staff non-editor) [ ] YAML subject tags - software peer review, packagename Would be something like this ? [ ] YAML language tags are ok ("Español" and "Spanish" for blog post in this language)
In that case can you edit my PR directly?
If anyone of you can tell me which file I should edit I will do it. I see a checklist folder with some csv file, but the content in those files are not the same I see on the html.
Hi Yani, the csv files are combined together to create the checklists (the editor-checklist-peer-reviewed-pkg
is added to editor-checklist
, etc.) The main ones to change would be editor-checklist
as this should apply to both types of post and I'm not sure it needs to be on the author checklist.
I can also make this change, but wanted to check in, should language tags be in their language, i.e. use "Español" rather than Spanish? I think that makes sense, and if so, we should make this consistent with the use cases in the forum (which use English versions of the language name).
Thanks for the explanation!. I think we need to use the word in the language of the post. So their language as you said. I'm trying to think why we would need to use the English name of the language and I can't think of anything. Agree on being consistent in how we announce and show the language of our content.
Okay, going with two tags for languages based on off-GitHub conversation with @yabellini. Rational (which I'm sure @maelle already concluded) is that we want these posts be found easily, so no matter how you search for it, you'll find it. Will help make sure English speakers also find the posts.
And of course that's how the current blog posts are tagged 🤦🏼♀️. I really need to start looking into things first!
I think we're good to go here, sorry for the above confusion 🐑
this is now outdated :tada:
Looks good to me! Do we want to add this to the checklists? or is that getting out of control?