Closed jeanetteclark closed 2 years ago
LGTM.
@amoeba can you give this a quick :eyes: and lemme know if we are good to merge?
This looks totally fine, though I wasn't able to reproduce the behavior I think, @jeanetteclark, you're aiming to adjust. Are you seeing attribute lists come back with column names like "annotation.valueURI.valueURI" and such?
Running of master
, I don't see that:
> library(EML)
>
> doc <- read_eml("https://arcticdata.io/metacat/d1/mn/v2/object/doi%3A10.18739%2FA25M6280M")
>
> al <- get_attributes(doc$dataset$dataTable[[1]]$attributeList)
> names(al$attributes)
[1] "id" "attributeName" "attributeLabel" "attributeDefinition"
[5] "unit" "numberType" "propertyLabel" "propertyURI"
[9] "valueLabel" "valueURI" "measurementScale" "domain"
@amoeba sorry I missed this. We were seeing the annotations get dropped entirely from existing attribute lists that had them, though when I reinstall EML from main
I see expected behavior as shown above. So maybe everyone is just on an older version of EML on our server? Not sure I'll need to check
I had one of our interns test by reinstalling using devtools::install_github("ropensci/EML")
and it works as expected, sorry for the false alarm! closing
Glad to hear that, at least. Thanks for checking @jeanetteclark!
reopening this, the error has cropped up again twice so something is wrong. here is a pid on arctic if you want to test @amoeba: urn:uuid:bcee3610-6c78-4590-90c3-8d21d4d2ea88
unfortunately it is not public read
Thanks @jeanetteclark, I'll have a look this week or next.
Hey @jeanetteclark, sorry to take my time getting to this.
As far as I can tell, this still affects the CRAN release of EML but not the latest code from git. I'm fairly certain 26c8dd7c069baf6ce85ea2ff78c344df3c68d0e6 fixes this issue but I know that code isn't on CRAN. Yet.
That said, I think your patch improves get_attributes because all four annotation-related columns get handled explicitly and uniformly, rather than only having code to handle propertyURI and valueURI.
@cboettig this is good to merge and can we plan to get a CRAN release out as soon as practical? Happy to help there.
Thanks @amoeba - I'd also be willing to help get the CRAN release in to whatever degree I can. Right now I think our team are working in a bit of version stew (some off my fork, some off the tip of master here, some on the CRAN version) and a CRAN release would really help I think
Some names in the attribute list were re-named to fit with other tools, but not the ones associated with URIs. I just added a few lines to fix those so that all of the annotation information is retrieved.