Vignette

[richfitz]

Once the DSL exists, need a vignette.

Might be worth having material covering both the DSL and direct interface.

[sckott]

• [ ] low level vignette (rich)
• [ ] DSL vignette (scott)

a single vignette now

[sckott]

started DSL vignette, not done yet

[smbache]

I think there is a pretty nice/seamless integration between low-level and dsl, with the new generic setup; thinking perhaps a single vignette will suffice?

[sckott]

Yeah, you're probably right.

[sckott]

vignette updated, focused on both high and low level, though mostly DSL

[smbache]

Will have a look

[sckott]

@richfitz @smbache Okay with the vignette? If so, we're ready to go. Rich, you are listed as maintainer. can you submit? or we can switch maintainers and I submit

[richfitz]

Switch maintainer perhaps?

[sckott]

Okay, will do

[smbache]

1) would it be useful with a short summary initially of jq is, for those unfamiliar? Just as to get an idea without having to visit the jq site?

2) no need for explicit name dropping ;-)

[sckott]

would it be useful with a short summary initially of jq is, for those unfamiliar? Just as to get an idea without having to visit the jq site?

More than this ? https://github.com/ropensci/jqr/blob/master/vignettes/jqr_vignette.Rmd#introduction-to-jqr

no need for explicit name dropping ;-)

what do you mean?

[smbache]

I guess it's fine, but I think that if you have no clue what it is, and want to know just a bit more than "json processor", you'll probably visit the jq page first... Which may be ok.

I mean the part where my name is explicitly "dropped" related to the pipe hack ;) now that I'm listed in the description that's more than enough, heh..

[sckott]

Right, will add more jq info, And will remove name drop :)

[smbache]

:)

[sckott]

i'll close this unless any other thoughts...