Open wincowgerDEV opened 2 years ago
We're not super actively maintaining this package, but if you have suggestions you are welcome to contribute, and I'll try to merge them.
Thanks for this feedback. Are there other r jsonld packages that you think may superced this one or is there another reason it isn't being actively maintained? I'm planning on putting in a lot of effort over the next two years to streamline jsonld integration in R. Are there other packages you think I should be aware of so that I don't reinvent the wheel?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022, 9:57 AM Jeroen Ooms @.***> wrote:
We're not super actively maintaining this package, but if you have suggestions you are welcome to contribute, and I'll try to merge them.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ropensci/jsonld/issues/19#issuecomment-1059796353, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGMUJU3PMZ3QTWTCFLMU5TDU6OG7PANCNFSM5P74L5HQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
AFAIK this is the only package. You are welcome to take over maintenance if you are seriously interested.
That is an exciting offer, I'm only maintaining one other package at the moment so I think I'd have the capacity and this package doesn't appear to be too complicated yet. Let me dive into the code backend and make a couple pull requests so that I can get a feel for it before I commit but I'm definitely interested.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022, 2:55 PM Jeroen Ooms @.***> wrote:
AFAIK this is the only package. You are welcome to take over maintenance if you are seriously interested.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ropensci/jsonld/issues/19#issuecomment-1059829959, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGMUJU2I45GKRNZUUY5Z6BTU6PC2NANCNFSM5P74L5HQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I was working through the examples and was surprised that this logical expression to test whether doc can be translated to RDF and back to JSON-LD in its exact form does not work.
After further inspection of json_fromrdf it looks like a "@id": ":b0", is being added as the first expression. Is this the desired behavior?
If this is something the team would like to add, I would be interested in working on it.