Improve documentation regarding endnotes

[elinw]

Thanks for this, I'm so happy to have easily extracted most of the xml data. However I noticed that some of the articles have endnotes rather than footnotes and I was wondering if you would consider adding a function to read those.

[tklebel]

Could you point me to a specific file that contains endnotes? A link to the file on JSTOR would be enough, then I can take a look.

[elinw]

http://www.jstor.org/stable/43264001

Here's the summary from find_article(): basename_id journal_doi journal_jcode journal_pub_id article_doi article_pub_id article_jcode 1 43264001 NA abajafhocodela 43264001 article_type article_title 1 research-article How to Respond to a Subpoena for Records by a Grand Jury or the HUD Inspector General volume issue language pub_day pub_month pub_year first_page last_page 1 3 4 eng 1 7 1994 7 15

[tklebel]

For this particularly article, the endnotes are stored in the ref-list, which find_references extracts. Therefore you can extract the endnotes via: jstor::find_references("path_to_file.xml").

From my experience, if there is information about citations contained in the xml-file, it can be retrieved either with find_footnotes or find_references. However, the documentation for this could probably be clearer.

Where would you expect hints on this behavior, so that you would find out about it on your own?

[elinw]

Oh I really thought I had checked and double checked but they were in my references file. I guess that makes sense in that endnotes are generally more like references than footnotes are and I think I was assuming they would be in footnotes since they are notes. Still, it would be good to document (I would probably put it in both places).

[tklebel]

Thanks for your comments! If you find any other issues, feel free to open another issue or create a pull request.