Closed SimonGoring closed 10 years ago
@SimonGoring I'm not sure what you mean? You prefer pollen.equiv <- NULL
? just be sure you realise this is not the way the R Gods have suggested this problem should be addressed.
That is exactly what the rgods have suggested. Even Dirk suggested the same thing recently.
I as actually referring to the use of data(..., envir=environment()), but also yes, the NULL.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Karthik Ram notifications@github.com wrote:
That is exactly what the rgods have suggested. Even Dirk suggested the same thing recently.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ropensci/neotoma/pull/144#issuecomment-56911515.
@karthik Really? Got a link so I can see what they were suggesting? The globalVariables()
thing is something R Core use internally for reference classes but assigning NULL
is simpler to write so I'd be happy to go with that but I'd like to see the arguments.
I think this is a tidier way of fixing the check issue for loading data.