Closed SimonGoring closed 10 years ago
Right now the implementation in get_download
is to just make a list of sites, but I've been working on code that at least binds sites (using merge
) and just appends age, site name, latitude and longitude. I think this the best option for now.
I've been thinking about it more. I think this ought to be a user level choice for now. There is no real benefit in combining things in a pre-defined way within the package, users will value some particular data over others, so providing a 'one size fits all' method of doing this doesn't make sense without broader input.
Some synthesis work uses multiple datasets and while the current objects are great it would be useful to make a meta-sampe object that would contain multiple count data for multiple sites. Basically a list that mirrors the object returned by
get_download
except:metadata
: instead of metadata for a single record there would be multiple rowssample.meta
: this is generally age data for a single site, maybe return this as a list, or return with columnssite
,age
,uncertainty
. Not sure yet.taxon.list
: the full set of taxa in the record.counts
: The full set of count data, except with row names identifying the core & core depth, to be associated with information inmetadata
.lab.data
: same as above, except that instead of assemblage data it would be the associated lab data.