Open bpjburger opened 3 years ago
Hi,
I've managed to re-run your analysis for Asteracea and I'm looking over the clusters. So that I can repeat your process, how are you determining that there is a mix of ITS and trnL in the first cluster?
The top thing I've noticed is ...
#specify the sequence IDs per cluster
sids <- reduced@clstrs[[i]]@sids
Should be:
#specify the sequence IDs per cluster
sids <- selected@clstrs[[i]]@sids
Where does the "reduced" phylota object originate? Mixing sids across different phylota objects could be causing the mixing of sequences in a cluster.
Hi @bpjburger did you solve the problem following @DomBennett correction? I am planning to do the same around here
Hi @Bunholi,
Unfortunately, the corrections did no solve the problem. I think that it is a software issue.
For info, we're looking for a new maintainer / a new maintainer team for this package, see #57 and feel free to volunteer, we'd be happy to help.
Hello,
I ran PhylotaR according to the tutorial, modifying it as is shown in the code below. To create fasta files for each cluster I ran a loop in R. But when checking the sequences in the resulting fasta-files I discovered that they contain different loci. The first cluster (and corresponding fasta) contained ITS and trnL. This issue is present in other clusters as well even in the pre-filtered phylota-object.
Is this the result of a mistake in my code or is this a PhylotaR issue? And how can I possibly fix it?
Regards,
Bart
The code: