Closed njahn82 closed 5 years ago
Hi all,
Wow, following this process has shown me a lot about the large effort that goes into creating a full package, including making sure it builds right. Really impressed by all the work and commitment!
Going through the package's workflow from a user perspective, I noticed that there a still a few inconsistencies/omissions in the description of the functions in the vignette, mostly to do with the arguments listed and the code examples given. I've listed these below.
I was able to run all functionality with the test dataset (example_data.txt), including all visualizations. When I tested with a user-generated dataset from Web of Science (.txt file, 490 records), I encountered two instances that gave error messages:
_Error in data.frame(names = unique(unlist(strsplit(C1names, "; "))), : row names contain missing values
When using only a subset of the file (1st 100 records), this error did not occur.
Let me know if you want to have those files for testing (can't link them here b/c of WoS restrictions)
Below my comments on my observations on the vignette for the different functions in the package:
2.1 references_read()
Appendix 1
2.2. authors_clean()
2.2.1-2.2.3 authors_refine()
2.4.1 plot_addresses_country()
2.4.2 plot_addresses_points()
2.4.3 plot_net_coauthor()
2.4.5 plot_net_address()
Hope this is still helpful!
Please find some suggestions to improve the vignette made during the rOpenSci software review. See the commit messages for more details.