Closed sckott closed 7 years ago
hey @dwinter - going through all ropensci repos trying to speed up Travis builds by using container based builds whenever possible
the build https://travis-ci.org/ropensci/rentrez/builds/209093544 isn't faster than the others on the first run, but should be faster the next time since deps are cached
Coverage remained the same at 97.857% when pulling f22afa71e80c9c381c805300d91132e439534e6a on travis-file into dd32d3601e582bcfbd36983c82f83bc884fac156 on master.
Cool, thanks @sckott !
hey @dwinter - going through all ropensci repos trying to speed up Travis builds by using container based builds whenever possible
the build https://travis-ci.org/ropensci/rentrez/builds/209093544 isn't faster than the others on the first run, but should be faster the next time since deps are cached