URLs: maybe add more - Githubissues

sckott commented 7 years ago

for

rendered pkgdown site or similar?
vignette on cran?
other?

maelle commented 6 years ago

"rendered pkgdown site or similar?" 👍

other: tutorial page (maybe OpenCPU tutorial page)

sckott commented 6 years ago

Good idea.

maelle commented 6 years ago

RTD if https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/28#issuecomment-364785685

maelle commented 6 years ago

With codemetar now in relatedLinks one gets:

the URL(s) from DESCRIPTION that are listed under URL and are not the codeRepository (so if you have both your GitHub repo and pkgdown website like this https://github.com/ropensci/codemetar/blob/master/DESCRIPTION#L41 you get the pkgdown website. So I guess we should encourage developers to use the URL DESCRIPTION field with all their links.
If the provider is CRAN or BioConductor (checked via the name of the package, and to get a confirmation we look whether there is a README badge which we should encourage -- otherwise you could call your package crul without its being the CRAN crul/if codemeta is built from an installed package we check the install source)

I guess it means we do not have the vignettes links. In theory one could scrape CRAN page and get them (or from metacran etc, I don't know). Would it make sense or is the CRAN canonical (of course) URL enough?

maelle commented 6 years ago

Other URL I've thought about adding https://github.com/ropensci/codemetar/issues/82

maelle commented 5 years ago

Closing this, if one stores the raw CodeMeta, one has more URLs than ever needed. :wink:

ropensci / roregistry

URLs: maybe add more #8