List of elements to mention in a blog update about the system

[maelle]

Since the latest blog post https://ropensci.org/blog/2017/09/11/software-review-update/

New standards

• Windows CI conditions https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/ci.html#whichci
• codemetar https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/building.html#creating-metadata-for-your-package (and reminded in https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/approvaltemplate.html)
• Recommend using a structure for the release notes, recommend NEWS.md not NEWS https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/releasing.html#news
• repostatus.org badges (but if no badge, for ropensci.org/badges we deduce a status from the GitHub organisation: concept if ropenscilabs, active otherwise) https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/building.html#readme
• Using roxygen2 is now an explicit requirement. https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/building.html#documentation

The whole dev_guide third part is new guidance, but it's all more suggestions than requirements except for the code of conduct and contributing guidelines. https://ropensci.github.io/dev_guide/collaboration.html

[noamross]

Other points to hit:

• New editors Lincoln and Anna https://ropensci.org/blog/2018/06/22/new_editors/
• The dev guide in general!
• New issue templates https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/new
• Onboarding --> Software Peer Review https://github.com/ropensci/software-review-meta/issues/11
• Badge versioning?

[maelle]

@noamross I was {--rude--}{++helpful++} and added links to your list to have them when writing the blog post. :-)

[noamross]

I edited your meta-comment :)

[maelle]

Started draft https://github.com/ropensci/roweb2/pull/412

[maelle]

Blog post published a while ago https://ropensci.org/blog/2019/02/01/software-review-news/