Closed robwschlegel closed 6 years ago
Thanks for your submission, @robwschlegel et al! This looks like a very useful package and an improvement over existing options. However, I'm afraid it falls out of scope for us, because it is primarily a statistical method implementation and visualization tool, neither of which fall under our reproducibility or other categories.
Nevertheless, we have many ocean folks in the rOpenSci community who would likely be interested in this package - I'll direct them to your repo to try this out. And I'd encourage you to submit to JOSS.
Hello Noam, Thank you for the rapid response. I understand that our package is not quite the right fit but thought I would submit it anyway. I'll definitely still be putting it on CRAN and submitting to JOSS. All the best, -Robert
On Sat, 26 May 2018, 22:52 Noam Ross notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for your submission, @robwschlegel https://github.com/robwschlegel et al! This looks like a very useful package and an improvement over existing options. However, I'm afraid it falls out of scope for us, because it is primarily a statistical method implementation and visualization tool, neither of which fall under our reproducibility or other categories https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/blob/master/policies.md#package-categories .
Nevertheless, we have many ocean folks in the rOpenSci community who would likely be interested in this package - I'll direct them to your repo to try this out. And I'd encourage you to submit to JOSS http://joss.theoj.org/ .
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding/issues/219#issuecomment-392287469, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHNY55J5iSLC-_ObiMYXqhhAdq7paezuks5t2cCjgaJpZM4UN4-Z .
Summary
What does this package do? (explain in 50 words or less): This package serves as an updated R version for code that was initially written in Python and then ported to R. The function of this package is to ensure reproducibility and comparability of research outputs for anyone studying (marine) heatwaves by ensuring comparability between languages and providing a speed boost.
Paste the full DESCRIPTION file inside a code block below:
URL for the package (the development repository, not a stylized html page): https://github.com/robwschlegel/heatwaveR
Please indicate which category or categories from our package fit policies this package falls under *and why(? (e.g., data retrieval, reproducibility. If you are unsure, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry.):
reproducibility, this is the primary purpose of this package, to ensure that all research carried out on heatwave analysis at least begins with the exact same algorithms and within the same framework
The target audience is any researcher(s) that would need to calculate the occurrence and severity of extreme (thermal) events in air or sea. The scientific application of this package is the calculation of said events, known as heatwaves. The definitions for these events provided in this package match exactly to those proscribed in Hobday et al. (2016), and which have become the standard for marine heatwave detection in Canada, Australia, and South Africa.
There is an older version of this package that may be found here: https://github.com/ajsmit/RmarineHeatWaves The reason for this update was to bring the older R version more in-line with the original Python version found here: https://github.com/ecjoliver/marineHeatWaves/ This new R version also provides a serious speed boost with the inclusion of Rcpp functions. It has also been redesigned from the ground up to meet best package practices as laid out by rOpenSci.
Requirements
Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
Publication options
paper.md
matching JOSS's requirements with a high-level description in the package root or ininst/
.Detail
[X] Does
R CMD check
(ordevtools::check()
) succeed? Paste and describe any errors or warnings:[X] Does the package conform to rOpenSci packaging guidelines? Please describe any exceptions:
If this is a resubmission following rejection, please explain the change in circumstances:
If possible, please provide recommendations of reviewers - those with experience with similar packages and/or likely users of your package - and their GitHub user names: