ropensci / software-review

rOpenSci Software Peer Review.
295 stars 104 forks source link

eneRgetics #374

Closed CamiloCarneiro closed 4 years ago

CamiloCarneiro commented 4 years ago

Submitting Author: Name (@CamiloCarneiro)
Repository: https://github.com/CamiloCarneiro/eneRgetics


Package: eneRgetics
Title: Estimates the Maintenance Metabolism of shorebirds
Version: 0.0.0.9000
Description: eneRgetics provides a fast and straightforward way to calculate the
    Maintenance Metabolism of shorebirds. It has functions to retrieve the necessary
    environmental data to calculate it, to retrieve tidal data and to create
    categories for the tide state in relation to low tide. Additionally, it provides
    a function to calculate the Basal Metabolic Rate of shorebirds.
Depends:
    R (>= 3.4.0)
License: GPL-3
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
RoxygenNote: 6.1.1
Imports:
    checkmate (>= 1.8.5),
    dplyr (>= 0.5.0),
    camsRad (>= 0.3.0),
    darksky (>= 1.3.0),
    lubridate (>= 1.1.7),
    RCurl (>= 1.95-4.8),
    jsonlite(>= 1.5)
Suggests:
    knitr,
    rmarkdown,
    testthat
VignetteBuilder: rmarkdown

Scope

annakrystalli commented 4 years ago

Hi @CamiloCarneiro ! Thanks for your submission. Could you please a link to the package's GitHub repository?

CamiloCarneiro commented 4 years ago

Hi. Sure. Here it is: https://github.com/CamiloCarneiro/eneRgetics

noamross commented 4 years ago

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️

In the interest of reducing load on reviewers and editors as we manage the COVID-19 crisis, rOpenSci is temporarily pausing new submissions for software peer review for 30 days (and possibly longer). Please check back here again after 17 April for updates.

In this period new submissions will not be handled, nor new reviewers assigned. Reviews and responses to reviews will be handled on a 'best effort' basis, but no follow-up reminders will be sent.

Other rOpenSci community activities continue. We express our continued great appreciation for the work of our authors and reviewers. Stay healthy and take care of one other.

The rOpenSci Editorial Board

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️

annakrystalli commented 4 years ago

Dear @CamiloCarneiro,

Thanks again for your submission. We have been discussing whether the package is in scope and have concluded that unfortunately it is not for the following reasons:

Having said that we still think your package may well be of use to domain specialist so we encourage you to continue making it available to your community should you wish to.

Some general advice for improving the package:

Many thanks again for your patience as we assessed the package.

CamiloCarneiro commented 4 years ago

Dear @annakrystalli,

Thank you for your time to assess the package and for the advice to improve it. Much appreciated.

Best regards.